Great Facebook communication! Are you simply too huge, too cool, and too awesome to share GUI changes with our community?
Ermmm, Happy 6th Anniversary!
You are well aware of the challenges we as a CyberSecurity community face from rapid changes in the technology landscape. FOSE 2010 is the place to discover opportunities and solutions along with changing expectations for government IT professionals.
Register today for the FOSE 2010 experience http://www.fose.com.
You can expect:
*FOSE is a must-attend free show for government, military, and government contractors.
It’s time to register and reserve your place at FOSE http://www.fose.com
Connect with FOSE
Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn | GovLoop
Recently, While watching the twitter public_timeline (TPT), I managed to get myself tangled up in an uncomfortable situation online. While on the TPT I came across an alleged hacktivist, became overly curious, and followed up by conducting private research to better understand the intentions behind his or her hacktivism activities.
It wasn’t long before I began to notice discrepancies in the hacktivist’s focused cyber attacks. While conversing with this particular hacktivist I also drew some curious head shakes from security experts who allegedly had connections with the US government (AC).
In a nutshell, I managed to upset both the hacktivist and the AC’s! All of this online drama came about because I unintentionally set myself up for such a situation to occur. Some of you may be wondering why I even bothered to pursue following and questioning such a controversial profile.
For as long as I can remember I’ve always been inherently curious. I was one of those kids who would find Santa’s hidden stash and secretly unwrap everyone’s Christmas gifts, then re-wrap all of the gifts back to perfection. Perhaps I was checking gift equality or I was just a nosy kid. Whatever the reason behind such invasive curiosity, this curiosity beast is one that I have to fend off and suppress on a consistent basis!
This type of curiosity could have easily become a Teksquisite reputation downfall. I could have been targeted both by the hacktivist and by government investigations. Though I did receive some direct communications via messaging and phone regarding statements I made about the hacktivist on twitter, I was not aware until much later in the game (by other concerned security
professionals) that this was a situation that I should graciously remove myself from.
“Harassment comes in many different forms and is not limited to physical or verbal abuse. Harassment can occur in any media or forum in which individuals interact.” –The Free Library
3 important steps to extricate yourself from situational cyberharassment
The above steps should sever any type of online harassment situation almost immediately. Although there may be some negative fallout from my particular situation, I anticipate that the steps I have taken above will successfully eliminate the possibility that cyberharassment will continue to exist.
If the above steps do not resolve a cyberharassment situation, you may be looking at the more serious case of cyberstalking.
“Cyberstalking and cyberharassment are very similar. Most people use them interchangeably, but there is a subtle distinction, typically relating to the perpetrator’s intent and the original motivation for their behavior.”
“While the two situations usually involve many of the same online tactics, cyberstalking is almost always characterized by the stalker relentlessly pursuing his\her victim online and is much more likely to include some form of offline attack, as well. This offline aspect makes it a more serious situation as it can easily lead to dangerous physical contact, if the victim’s location is known.” –Wiredsafety
In the past I have voluntarily worked with both Wiredsafety.org as an Internet Security Specialist and HaltAbuse.org as an Internet Security Advocate. Both organizations offer extensive help to victims of cyberstalking. If you are involved in an online situation that has escalated beyond the status of cyberharassment, be sure to contact one of the organizations listed above for further information on how to protect yourself online.
Until next time – stay safe online!
Facebook Is Going To Start Charging Money!
This scam first appeared on Facebook during December 2009. Users who joined this group were tricked into clicking a malicious link that took them off-site while secretly dumping malware on their computer.
“The ongoing thread that Facebook will soon begin charging for their site doesn’t appear to be slowing. The other night I was having dinner with a family friend who told me about a scoop he had that Facebook would soon begin charging for the site and proceeded to explain why he would pay. While it’s great that Facebook has provided value to his life and millions of others, the company will not charge users to access the site.” –All Facebook
Researching current 14,99 groups/pages appears to be harmless with no suspicious links found. You can read more about this group at All Facebook.
Get A Free Pair Of UGGS!
You have to first verify that you can give out some private information, via taking one of the offered quizzes:
Does this IQ Challenge seem a little too familiar to you? In July 2009 WBZ-TV 4 in Boston reported on the “I.Q. Test” scam occurring on Facebook. Six months later, this scam is still connected to Facebook. Check out the details at WBZ-TV video.
Pay Attention To Possible Scams And Scammers!
Become a fan of *** Project NOSCAM *** and follow the weekly updated lists of:
** Notable Facebook Scams to be aware of **
If you find a scam or scammer on Facebook, do the site a favor and report it within the Group/Page
and also report the scam Group/Page to Project NOSCAM.
“If you allow an application or website to connect with your Facebook account, that application or website can access information on Facebook related to you and your friends and generate and publish stories about actions you take on that application or website without any additional permission.” –Facebook
Help take a Byte out of Facebook Scams!
In May of Last year The London Daily News reported that YouTube censored US journalist Alex Jones, best known for investigative reporting on the 9/11 terrorist attacks. At that time the “Alex Jones Show” on YouTube had over 1 million views per week, and was also responsible for “The Obama Deception.”
“Increasingly YouTube has been scorned for its move away from its foundation of “free speech video” to being seen as part of the establishment it tried to redefine when it was first established.” –PrisonPlanet TV
Censorship?
YouTube, emulates a meritocracy where highest user ratings and most views will land you on the front page. A vote-bot is a piece of software that can be used to systematically downgrade or upgrade vote popularity. Vote-botting can also be used to deflate vote ratings to such low levels that this forces the video out of search results.
Over the past two years certain YouTube communities such as Atheist YouTubers have suffered greatly under the deluge of YouTube vote-bots. Atheist video popularity ratings have been frequently sabotaged by strategically planned and maliciously orchestrated bands of malicious vote-bots. It is not unusual for video popularity to be reduced from a 5-star to a 1-star rating within a few minutes of these attacks.
“The bot armies are particularly onerous, automating the process of creating accounts, searching for any video by a particular user, then down-rating them all — resulting in such unlikely scenarios as a few thousand 1-star ratings on a video that’s only been up for a few minutes, thus pushing the video so far down the listings that nobody’s likely to ever see it to begin with.” –How to cheat at Youtube
Another method utilized to censor information on YouTube is defined as false flagging. This can be an automated process that flags videos as inappropriate when content is actually innocuous. The most vile flagging campaigns that I am aware of on YouTube, has been via fundamentalist and religious zealot groups. In their attempt to bully the YouTube fringe groups of Atheists, Wiccan’s, and Pagens, they have managed to destroy the advocacy of free speech at YouTube.
In an article titled You Tube Needs Fixin,’ Professor PZ Myers, biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris stated: “One of the big problems with YouTube is that science channels that criticize creationists are often shut down — they are targeted by votebots that lower their ratings, and there are plenty of people who file frivolous notifications of DMCA violations that lead to whole channels being shut down until the case is fought out. This is not good — the system is hair-trigger sensitive to complaints, but does nothing to filter out the noise of unwarranted claims made solely to silence people.”
The most powerful tool that fundamentalist and religious zealot groups have used against fringe groups at YouTube is the filing of False DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) claims. This forces YouTube to legally remove the video — effective immediately.
If they are still unable to restrict fringe group information with the three methods I listed above, eventually they often pull a full monty by filing multiple false DCMA claims. They know if they file multiple DCMA claims within a short period of time, that the victims channel will be suspended.
“There is a fight going on at Youtube, a fight for free speech, rationality and reason.” –rozeboosje
Please sign the Google/YouTube Censorship Reform Petition
Until Next time – don’t allow yourself to be bullied and stay safe online!
Tekblog is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache